CNN Rape Report: No Comment

Something caught my eye this morning; the news section on my Google homepage featured a headline “thousands slam CNN for rape case report.”

Pretty attention grabbing, so I had a look.

The rape of a teenage girl by two high school football stars at a party occurred in the town of Steubenville, and received a lot of attention nationally and worldwide.

So when CNN ran a report on the case that painted the two guilty boys in an “innocent,” sympathetic light, the general public was very unimpressed.

Social media went crazy and e-mails bombarded CNN demanding apologies for this controversial coverage that hardly mentioned the girl who was raped.

So I did my usual routine when I see controversies such as this. Wanting to hear what CNN had to say.

First to their website… nothing.

Okay, strange, it must be hidden on the web somewhere?

So I did a Google search along the lines of “CNN responds” … still nothing but news from around the world on CNN’s “disgraceful report.”

Social media? Surely? … Nup.

Finally, I came to the realisation that CNN had not responded at all. So here I am reading hundreds of stories about how horrible they are, public uproar etc… and not a single statement or explanation by CNN.

Why does this always happen?

One of the key things I’ve learned about crises is that no response is rarely the best option. It implies admission of guilt.

Especially in this case, if not an apology, even a simple explanation that it was not intended to come across as it did would suffice.

But all the public searching for answers have heard nothing but negativity towards the company and it will be hard to change this feeling towards them – especially seeing as they have missed the 24 hour gap in which they needed to respond.

Even if they do respond in the next couple of days – it will be too late. This negative stigma will be attached to CNN in the minds of many people for a long time to come.

I am very interested to get out into the world of PR myself and experience the logic behind these situations.

Did they think it would just blow over? Was there trouble in the legal department? Or were they sure a statement would just inflame the situation?

It looks so incredibly bad from the public’s perspective that I simply can’t imagine what would justify it.

But for now, from this perspective… Crisis: 1 – CNN: 0.


2 thoughts on “CNN Rape Report: No Comment

  1. Good blog.. wonder why they would not respond! Your statement ‘no response is rarely the best option’ is quite thought provoking too – in this day and age that really would be the case wouldn’t it… in the days before social media though perhaps this was a ‘it will blow over’ sort of thing. Interesting Blog Mel.

  2. Hmmm… surely the minset is something like the fact that CNN have such a huge global image so they can afford to wait for this to blow over and people won’t stop tuning in to their reports. However true I believe this to be, surely a company that big, with such an obvious obligation to the public, would have teams of PR reps to handle situations like this? Why then, as you said, haven’t they at least offered some sort of comment to at least suften the blow, even if they weren’t keen on a full apology? Very strange indeed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s